Bike shares hit New York last week, and Tbe New Yorker commemorated it with a cover that points up one of the follies of urban life.
Made me wonder what Jane Jacobs, that lover of New York and walkable/bikeable cities, would think. The late urbanist, whose iconoclastic ideas turned thinking about cities on its head in the 1960s, was a friend of the bicycle: she spent hours one summer helping her son assemble bikes that he'd imported from China as part of an attempt to get people on two wheels.
As the success of bike-share programs show, her ideas are increasingly relevant. An appreciation of that comes out in the recent collection of essays on her and her legacy, called What We See: Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs.
Edited by Stephen A. Goldsmith and Lynne Elizabeth, it contains more
than 30 short reflections about what Jacobs meant in New York, Toronto and around
the world, how her ideas have been influential, and how events elsewhere
demonstrate her perspicacity. It ends with a series of questions about
each essay that could serve as points of departure for discussion by
community groups about their own particular problems, or as study guides
in urban affairs programs.
Let me say straight up that Jane Jacobs is one of my heroes. Her ideas about cities inspired my book Green City: People, Nature and Urban Places, and she is a character in my The Walkable City: From Haussmann’s Boulevards to Jane Jacobs’ Street and Beyond. When What We See... came out, I spent several evenings dipping into it with pleasure. And by chance at the same time I was also reading James Holston’s The Modernist City, an anthropological study of Brasília which in many respects is the antithesis of what Jacobs’ stood for.
The two books go together like hand in glove, although there is no
mention of Jacobs in Holston’s work. The Brazilian capitol which
celebrated its 50th anniversary in April, 2010, was conceived as an
egalitarian model city inspired by the Swiss architect Le Corbusier
exactly at the moment that Jacobs was noting the problems the modernist
idea was presenting elsewhere. Brasília features big blocks of
residences, grand vistas of public buildings, wide highways for
automobiles and no streets.
From the beginning, however, the
people who built it and the people who wanted to live there tried to
undo the modernist vision. One example which Jacobs would have
appreciated is the way storekeepers given space in large buildings where
the entrances were to be on verdant parkland, switched their shops’
orientation. The opposite side, facing on the walkways and parking lots
intended for provisioning the stores, became the “fronts” because people
wanted the bustle of a street-like setting.
It’s interesting that one of the contributors to What We See
is Jaime Lerner, the former mayor of another Brazilian city, Curitiba.
Beginning in the 1970s, the main commercial streets there became
pedestrian, and an integrated public transportation system has developed
to become a model of how to woo people away from private car and to
stop urban sprawl of both the middle class and the slum variety.
Perhaps because I live in a Canadian city and because I’ve followed
Jacobs’ thought for more than 40 years, I found contributions from
writers outside North America the most interesting and original parts of
What We See. For example,
Matias Echanove and Rahul Srivastava’s essay “The Village Inside” told
me much I didn’t know about how Tokyo grew by incorporating villages
into the urban fabric. The result was a rich—if sometimes “messy”
looking—mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. Dharavi, the
Mumbai slum featured in Slumdog Millionaire,
has several points in common with the Tokyo of the early 20th century,
the authors suggest. I bet London of the 19th century did too. The
lessons to draw from these examples underscore the importance of working
on a human scale to integrate different elements in a growing city, and
not to raze what’s there or try to build a city on a virgin site as was
done in Brasília.
As for biking in Brasilia, it wouldn't seem that people do much of it. Here's a video made last November of a group, Pedal Noturno, of night bike riders crossing a bridge in the city. The fact that there are so few riders suggests that biking doesn't have the cachet it has elsewhere--or that it's anything but something to do on special occasions.
No comments:
Post a Comment