My friend Ann Charney and I had an interesting exchange about
historical novels recently. She’s not that keen on them—“if you want to
write about an historical period, why don’t you write non-fiction?” she
asks--while I sometimes find them a wonderful window onto both human
nature and the past.
But I must admit I was terribly disappointed by A.S. Byatt’s novel, The Children’s Book.
Byatt (that's her on the left) is a writer who can catch the moment gloriously—some of her
short stories are wonderful in the way they describe sensations so
vividly that they stay with you months afterward. Her novel Possession is a masterful
combination of such luminous descriptors of incident and of a story
that encompasses decades. But I have found it a chore to read her four Frederica novels—The Shadow of the Sun, The Virgin in the Garden, A Whistling Woman (which I threw aside) and Babel Tower
(by far the best.) The books tell me far more than I want to know about
the world of her characters. All would have profited from editors who
were not afraid to perform a savage pruning.
Byatt won
the Blue Metropolis International Literary Prize a couple of years ago,
which meant she gave several readings
and interviews in Montreal. I did not hear her, but apparently she was riveting,
and more than one acquaintance bought The Children's Book on the strength of
that.
Therefore I was more than ready to give her the
benefit of the doubt with this new book. It is filled with vivd
descriptions (particularly about pots and pantomime costumes), but once
again I found myself growing cross with the way she tried to pour the
history of the world from 1895 to 1920 into 600 pages. Everything is
there, including an ending in the trenches of World War I. Why didn’t
Byatt allow herself to be edited, to cut out much of the background
information so our eyes are focused on her characters and their singular
accomplishments? As Ann might say, if I wanted to know about the the
period I would have read history, perhaps Barbara Tuchman's excellent The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World before the War.
I
read the novel in a couple of days--there is much that is engaging,
some moments are brilliant—but what I would give for reading the same
book with 100 pages cut from it! That would be something for the ages.
No comments:
Post a Comment